Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05640 11
Original file (05640 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

REC
Docket No: 05640-11
1 March 2012

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 29 February 2012. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,
regulations, and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy on 6 June 2009, at age 20. On 15
December 2010, you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for
failure to obey a lawful order by wrongfully giving alcohol to
minors. On 19 January 2011, you were notified that
administrative discharge procedures were initiated and that you
would receive a general discharge due to misconduct. The
discharge authority directed a general discharge. You were so
discharged on 19 February 2011. At that time, you were assigned
an RE-4 reentry code.

The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
overall record of service. Nevertheless, the Board concluded
these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the
characterization of service, given your record of one NJP. In
this regard, an RE-4 reentry code is required when an individual
has committed misconduct and not recommended for retention. The
Board believed you were fortunate to have received a general
discharge, since normally, when an individual has committed
misconduct, he will be separated and assigned an other than
honorable characterization of service. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

Since your discharge is less than 15 years old, you may apply
the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) for a possible upgrade.

I have enclosed a copy of NDRB’s application for your
convenience.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

\p Neoek FRY F
Executive D

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4351 13

    Original file (NR4351 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 April 2014. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing your reentry code given the seriousness of your misconduct that resulted in two NUPs, a ‘civil conviction and that you were no longer qualified for submarine service... The Board believed you were fortunate to receive a general discharge since Sailors who are...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04853-10

    Original file (04853-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Additionally, you _were counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action. The Board did not consider whether to upgrade your discharge or change the reason for separation because you have not exhausted your administrative remedy of applying to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03553-11

    Original file (03553-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11545 12

    Original file (11545 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 November 2012. The discharge authority directed a general discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00475 12

    Original file (00475 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08357-10

    Original file (08357-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 2011. The Board also noted that you are entitled to submit the attached Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States (DD Form 293) to the Naval Council of Personnel Review Boards, Attention: Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB), 720 Kennon Street, SE, Room 309, Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC 20375-5023,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01121-11

    Original file (01121-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BIG Docket No: 1121-11 31 October 2011 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. The Board noted that you were fortunate to receive a general characterization of service,since an other than honorable discharge is normally assigned when an individual is found to have committed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0254 14

    Original file (NR0254 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your “application on 12 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, ‘regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4388-13

    Original file (NR4388-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2013. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00564-11

    Original file (00564-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2011. The Board also noted that you are entitled to submit the attached Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States (DD Form 293) to the Naval Council of Personnel Review Boards, Attention: Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB), 720 Kennon Street, SE, Room 309, Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC...